[Interpost] SOPA is dead… Oh really?


It’s probably the happiest Friday of the year to most people in the western part of the world today (it’s already Saturday over here). The news about Lamar Smith (SOPA chief sponsor) pulled the bill now spread across the net. However for me the ‘threat’ is not over yet.

It is not over until those SOPA backers learned about the real definition of piracy and the difference between piracy and theft. Lamar saying online piracy is the same as “offline” theft sounds so stupid. Although piracy is wrong, saying that it’s a theft is also wrong because if anything piracy only leads to loss of revenue but not property loss.

Sometimes I think piracy is necessary, especially for copyrighted content that has no available way to be obtained legally, but only for sharing purpose and not for commercial distribution. For example many music videos are made only for the purpose of airing on MTV or anywhere else but not for sale. I’m not a fan of American entertainment but I understand there are fans who want to keep those videos for personal collection. However if there’s no way to buy it even if they’re willing to pay for it then the only way to keep it is to rip it off from TV broadcast or online streaming. Don’t blame those people, they wanted to buy those content but copyright holders just didn’t sell them.

Now let’s look back into SOPA. If we look deeper we’d surely found that according to SOPA any websites with features that make it possible to post infringing content will be deemed as “facilitating intellectual property crime“. No matter how you rephrase it to make it sounds good, it’s still bad from the core to the surface. Why? Because that is like it is a crime to provide a way to share videos or to put an image in a website as those features can be used to make copyrighted content available for the so-called “illegal” sharing. If you ask me that is like blaming the whole internet itself because the internet allows users to send/receive from one another!

That said, there’s a possibility that SOPA might be resurrected in the future, as long as the SOPA lobbyists still doing their business. Oh right I have a better idea. Let’s kill those SOPA lobbyists, I mean the Hollywood, MPAA/RIAA. Switch to anime. Anime has its own piracy problems too but the Japanese anime industries players are not that butthurt as those Americans (although it may have worse licensing system than the US).

What we truly need here is not SOPA and we don’t have to prosecute the small ‘pirates’ either (people who get copyrighted content because it’s unavailable locally). We need copyrighted content to be available everywhere so that people could get what they want whenever they want. Our copyright and licensing, as well as patent system need a major revamp because the current one only makes the copyright holders win. The consumers need to win too!

Enhanced by Zemanta

[Interpost] SOPA, PIPA, America, Malaysia & Corporatism


United States of America

I’m sorry for making this blog “blacked-out” yesterday (thus no new article except for Project 360). Yes, I’m already an anti-SOPA/PIPA activist so I participated in the worldwide web blackout event. If anything blame SOPA.

American politics now is backed by corporations. The politicians now have support from corporations. Corporations now can manipulate the congress without directly join the politics. It’s no longer about democracy or capitalism. I’d not blame either democracy or capitalism for what is happening now. It’s the corporatism that is at fault.

The paragraph above pretty much has explained about corporatism. Yes, it’s when corporations and corporate bodies regulate the law for the sake of their own pockets. It’s when those entities use their money to ‘buy’ law, not necessarily by bribing the politicians but by making those politicians believe everything that said.

I know piracy is bad. In fact, just because there’s always a way to circumvent anti-piracy solutions doesn’t mean we should tolerate piracy but what is wrong right now is piracy is only being defined by those greedy corporations. I know too that most people are unreasonable too as they’d want everything to be free. However the corporates are also at fault for this. It’s their business models that always made people believe that copyrighted items would never be possible to obtain without resorting to piracy. One of the best example for this is the licensing system for foreign distribution. Say if some local firm want to distribute US copyrighted items here they’d have to obtain the license to do that first, that is, if the copyright holder in the US allows that. Even if the local distributor is willing to pay for the license, but if the copyright holder simply refused then local distribution would still impossible.

Come to think of it, we Malaysian have been calling the US as “Amerika Syarikat” since we recognized the nation. Under direct translation, “United States of America” would translate into “Negeri-negeri Bersatu Amerika” but since the Arabic loanword “Syarikat” has been used in Malay even before America was born, and the fact that it means “group/company/corporation” in Malay, it is used to substitute the mouthful “Negeri-negeri Bersatu” part (the part that carries the meaning of “United”). In other words, we’ve been calling America as “America Corporation” all this time. It’s as if our ancestors have foreseen the future America will be under corporatism.

Actually America is not alone here. Even the Japanese anime/gaming industries are equally as bad, if not worse. Anime is usually takes years to arrive here ‘legally’, and even if there were licensed distributors that offer simultaneous online streaming to viewers in this region, chances are they are always expensive, often more expensive that what the Japanese paid to view the same thing. Of course distributors need to make some gain too from the distribution but the real problem that contributes to the increase of price there is the licensing fee. Distributors have no choice but to cover the fee from the sales.

Now you should be able to see, the real problem is not piracy, it’s the business model. Although copyright and licensing exist to protect intellectual properties, now it seems like it’s being misused to squeeze more money from people. Some things that should be given free are also being charged in the name of protecting IP. If that is not bad enough then I don’t know what is.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The perfect girl with the flaw of liking anime (via クロス† チャネル)


A Kuroneko post. Don’t miss it (^_^)

The perfect girl with the flaw of liking anime I was hoping to talk about my love for Kuroneko, but I guess not this time. When I first started watching OreImo I put it aside as being a Nogizaka Haruka knock-off but this time instead of the absolute perfect girl at school being a closet anime fan. It's the male protagonist's absolute perfect younger sister who is a closet anime fan. I would say that besides those things it really doesn't have much to do with Nogizaka Haruka plot in similarity … Read More

via クロス† チャネル

I’ve decided, the Part 2 of my blog art…


I’ve decided, the Part 2 of my blog article “Halfey’s Most Influential Anime Girls of All Time” will be published next year. I still need more sources and need to do more research too before I can publish it. I want the article to have as little flaw as I could.

EDIT: recently some moe fans taught me a…


EDIT: recently some moe fans taught me a few other bad logic: critics are bitter people, criticizing is forbidden, criticism is a sin. Oh well I wonder who is the bitter people now.

Actually moe fans who have problems with criticism are the bitter people here. While critics usually prefer more serious anime over moe/slice-of-life anime they never forbid moe fans from liking serious anime too, let alone forbidding them from keep liking moe anime itself. However on the other hand the bitter moe fans keep whining about critics who take a liking on some moe titles, some even make a counter-criticism against the interest in serious anime. Clearly the bitter people would be the one who can’t accept the opposite views.

NOTE: Criticism isn’t meant to spoil the fun. If you think criticism would spoil your fun then don’t read any criticism, or if you think criticism is spoiling the fun, or if you tend to take offense when people said the things you have fun with do have flaws, then it would only mean that you are indeed the bitter people.

The worst logic some “genius” moe fans have taught me


How I wish I could use ad hominem to attack those “genius” moe fans by saying “you’re no good at maths, that’s why you love moe like ‘genius’”, but I’m not that kind of person (though having mentioned about it here means deep inside I do have the intention but I didn’t go that far but instead only went as far as sharing what I thought here). Here are the logics that are deemed as flawless by those “genius” moe fans:

  1. If there are moe in an anime then the anime is a moe anime, also true for all slice-of-life anime.
  2. Keion is moe. If people hate keion then they hate moe.
  3. Keion is an anime. Keion is moe. Then moe is anime.
  4. Keion is moe. Keion is an anime. If people hate keion then they hate anime.

Below is the 5th one and probably the most complicated of all the logics:

Keion is an anime. Keion is moe. There are people who hate keion so those people also hate anime and moe. Later comes new anime. There are moe in that anime so it is a moe anime. But people who hate keion also like this new anime. Those people are hypocrite because they hate anime and moe since they hate keion but they take a liking to this new anime which is a moe anime because it contains moe. Their interest in this new anime should never be approved unless they start learning to love keion and drop their hatred towards it. Well, perhaps they seem to take a liking towards this new anime because they hope to find flaws that they could use to attack moe, so we should never see their interest in this anime as pure and without any bad intention. Also they keep denying that this new anime is not a moe anime. Yes, they are just in denial because they are just biting their tongue since they once hated moe (in the form of keion and some other slice of life drama like lucky star).

Lets not forget about the 6th one:

Moe to us is like the sex scenes in hentai anime, where the story does not matter.

Or it could be turned into this:

Moe anime has to be that way because it serves a different purpose than “serious anime” does. It’s similar to the way hentai anime is intended for.

Last but not least, since hentai is mentioned above then the 7th one is worth a mention too:

Excessive fanservice in anime is a distraction even if the anime has proper story. Excessive moe in anime is an attention even if the anime has no story.

Don’t you think it’s unethical and immor…


Don’t you think it’s unethical and immoral for any employers to fire or cut down their employees’ salary without telling them the reason beforehand?

And don’t you think there should be an act to protect workers from being fired (or having their salary being cut down) by their employers unprofessionally?

What I’m Avoiding


Generally speaking, I hate anything that gets in my way. Although I tend to avoid everything that I hate, if those things that I hate are happen to get in my way I'll face them because I feel like it. I'll keep harassing them until they get out of my way or until they follow my way. But all that has nothing to do with what I'm avoiding as per what explanation below.

Chuck Norris (1)

20 things that I'm avoiding:

1. Chuck Norris

He is the sum of all fears. Nobody in the right mind would voluntarily face him unless you're ready to be roundhouse-kicked out from this universe to another dimension. By the way he is the only one here that I avoid not because I hate him but rather because he's too awesome.

2. Gays (that includes lesbos, yaoi and yuri)

Because I'll never know when they will assault me. Actually all gays should never be born in the first place because it's hypocritical if you are happy for being born but you yourself will never reproduce with your same-sex partner.

3. Atheists (and/or free thinkers, but not including pagans)

All they're doing is bitching and complaining and whining about God laws governing them, such as restrictions for gay marriage. Heck! Marriage is a religion thing to begin with so why must they being noisy about it when it has nothing to do with what they believe?

4. iFags (a.k.a. Apple fanboys/loyalists)

They think they are special just because they own a Mac/iPod/iPhone/iPad. Well, I'm not stylish (or stupid) enough to own iProducts. Even my T-shirts are bought from roadside stalls where I can get 3 for only 10 bucks.

5. Facebook

Although I used to be a Fagsbook user too it doesn't mean I love it to the point that I will never leave it. With tons of online doppelgangers inside it can be too annoying when people keep mistaking me as their acquaintance.

6. Feminazi

I don't mind with feminists if they keep it to the moderate level but most of the time those extremists feminazis will relate everything that seems not favoring their kind as "discrimination against women" even if it's just a simple thing like a guy trying to correct his girlfriend's mistakes by telling her what she's supposed to do (purely from his point of view, without resorting to any violence at all).

7. CLI (it stands for Command Line Interface, not the cli that you know)

I don't see any reason to prefer CLI over GUI (Graphical User Interface) when GUI is available. It may be faster and easier to code than GUI but with only a few milliseconds difference, coupled with the fact that computers today are powerful enough that some of them reaching the point of being overkill, it doesn't make sense anymore for power user to keep relying on it.

8. Bustin Jieber, Gady Laga, Ciley Myrus, Ladam Ambert (blahblah! You name it)

The words are not enough for me to describe just how "hate-able" those people are that I have to 'avoid' writing their names properly. Perhaps it's enough if I just say that by default all American artists deserve a rejection from me. Of course there are a few exceptions but this is only applicable to those who are exceptionally good, though that kind of artists are endangered species that are as rare as chicken's teeth.

9. Korean entertainment

It's not that I hate them by default but I can't easily forget how they steal everybody's attention while people are still enjoying Japanese entertainment (not limited to J-drama and J-rock/J-pop songs). If not people might have better terms with anime today. And I can't understand why there are significant number of anime fans like them as well when they have nothing to do with anime in the first place. Maybe those people are just confused between Korean and Japanese?

10. You

Yes, you. I hate you and I found that everything about you is "hate-able" like your musical preferences, the anime you watch, your friends, how you speak/write, your reactions towards me and even the websites you visit. I hate you too much to the point that I have to avoid writing down the names of all of you here, so it can't be helped. However you should feel 'honored' for being hated by me, because it's not easy to get my hate. In fact some people are dying or even died just for trying to get me to hate them. Yes, those people just love to be hated by me, and in return, along with the hatred, I respect them too for struggling for my hate and living up to their masochistic nature.

"HEY HALFEY WHERE ARE THE OTHER 10 DAMMIT?!" you asked? Sorry but I hate them too much that I have to 'avoid' writing them here as well.

(13/30 people avoid me for no apparent/real reason or simply just because they can't afford to face me alive)

Powered by Plinky

The World Would Be a Better Place If… (part II)


The world would be a better place if we could make cigars and smoking habit completely vanished. I was a smoker too and I start smoking when I was still a teenager. However I managed to quit even before I graduated from my high school, and completely quit before I reach 20. Now I hate cigars and smoking. The truth about smoking is it turns one into a loser because addiction is a characteristic of a loser. Don’t agree with me? Then you’re wrong.

No Smoking

Smoking is a ‘deliberate’ addiction. What I mean by deliberate here is, the addiction is ‘created’ because as far as I know, unlike more stronger drugs like morphine, heroine and cocaine, nicotine by itself is not very addictive in nature. In other words, addiction towards smoking will not happen if one smoke only once or twice, unless one doing it repetitively to the point of addiction. So it’s actually an avoidable addiction.

Why do people smoke anyway? Like I said above I was a smoker myself when I was still in high school. After I quit smoking I did asked myself the above question. My answer is “I just feel like too”. Implying that most other smokers also share the same answer, I must say most smokers don’t have any real reason for smoking, and even if they do, chances are they just came up with it to as excuses to rationalize why they smoke.

Actually smoking addiction is just a bad habit and not really addiction actually. What I’m talking here is, there are already many alternatives for nicotine delivery system out there, like nicotine pills, nicotine chewing gums, nicotine patch, and even nicotine inhaler, if nicotine is what those smokers really need. But most of them chose not to switch, because of the unreasonable fear they have; they can’t imagine life without smoking!

Why the hell is that? It’s because puffing a cigar is a HABIT. If they really want to satisfy their addiction they can just use any of the alternatives mentioned above but they didn’t because for them nothing can match the ‘coolness’ of lighting a cigar, holding it with two fingers, putting the filter-end between the lips, inhaling the smoke and blowing the smoke. Believe me doing that ain’t cool; it’s stupid, and I know I was stupid too.

People said there’s no use to ban smoking because people will still do it anyway and work around it. That’s bullsh1t. Hey! Speeding on the legal road is also against the law but why people still do illegal racing there? The point is not about the banning itself, because both smoking and illegal racing are damaging in nature and people will always try to do it. However we can’t just let people keep damaging their own life without doing a thing.

(55/57 smokers got angry after reading this post and swear will smoke to death as a protest)

Powered by Plinky